Ginsburg's dissent
Apr. 19th, 2007 06:41 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
dirtylibrarianAnd, for the first time since Roe, the Court blesses a prohibition with no exception safeguarding a woman’s health.
As I'm understanding it, this seems to be the vital point...theoretical children are being put before the health of living women. Not good.
fromcelandineb via jillbertini
As I'm understanding it, this seems to be the vital point...theoretical children are being put before the health of living women. Not good.
from
celandineb via jillbertini
